Bronkhorst, Johannes (1993), The Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient India, Motilal Banarsidass Publ. de Jong, J. W. (1993). "The Beginnings of Buddhism". The Eastern Buddhist. 26 (2): 11–30. ISSN 0012-8708. JSTOR 44361993. Sucitto, Ajahn (2010), Turning the Wheel of Truth: Commentary on the Buddha's First Teaching, Shambhala

Schmithausen, On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism. In: Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus (Gedenkschrift für Ludwig Alsdorf), hrsg. von Klaus Bruhn und Albrecht Wezler, Wiesbaden 1981, 199-250. Randomized Outcomes: The best thing about the yes or no wheel is that the outcomes from the wheel are completely random and unbiased. So you can be sure that the answer to your yes or no question has been decided by fate. Stress Alleviation: Do you sometimes get stressed while making simple decisions? Well, just use the yes-no wheel to make the decision. Why worry when your decision buddy is here!The origin of suffering, as a noble truth, is this.' Such was the vision... 'This origin of suffering, as a noble truth, can be abandoned.' Such was the vision... 'This origin of suffering, as a noble truth, has been abandoned.' Such was the vision... in regard to ideas not heard by me before. Interactive Engagement: Our tool is highly interactive as it boasts a unique and immersive user interface. Also, watching the wheel spin and waiting for an answer creates a different level of excitement among the users.

accesstoinsight, Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta: Setting the Wheel of Dhamma in Motion, translated from the Pali by I enjoyed the first few Sword of Truth books. Not so much anything after that. I vaguely recall reading somewhere that around halfway through the series, the author either ditched his editor, or perhaps had become so popular that the power dynamics between him and his publisher/editor had shifted. Not sure if that's actually true, or just someone's speculation online, or if I'm just completely misremembering, that would be explain the main flaws I see in the latter works: A bit bloated, very sloppy, and as others have mentioned, maybe a little self-indulgent by an author who likes his own writing a bit much.`The first few books weren't particularly highbrow or original, but they were fun enough and made me care about the characters enough to keep reading even after they stopped being fun... for a while, at least.It has been many years since I last read anything from Terry Goodkind, but from what I remember...It can drag at times. My friend who loved both series skips most of one book when he re-reads since it has a huge part of just politics, like the political maneuvering of one nation and how its trade agreements are going and such. I found it interesting, but I can see why some would find it really boring. I think at least one book had just a few chapters with the main character in it, which can be off-putting but works. (On the other hand, one of the books in Sword of Truth also is from a different point of view, so that's a mark against both series.) It's probably the best fantasy series I've read that isn't a classic like Tolkein's stuff. I'm also a huge fan of Brandon Sanderson, so his finishing it up was a plus for me.