Alfa Network AWUS036NHA – USB WiFi Adapter, 150 Mbps, 802.11b/g/n, RP-SMA, AR9271L Atheros Chipset

Product Information

If you always travels outstation or overseas and stay in Hotel with Wifi Hotspot, This is your best choice because from my own experience, your Laptop build in Wifi is too weak and always fail to get the connection Alfa wifi adapters became famous because of its quality and the power of the device. If you are working as a pentester and you need to do a audit to a wifi network, this device is a must have. I’ve had the same issue with the busy devices, but usually disconnecting and reconnecting will fix that. i here put a simple list of commands before starting penetration testing - (i assume that you are using 2 network cards)

Using Alfa AWUS036NHA on Microsoft Windows 10 - Rokland

iwconfig wlan(x) txpower 30 - This is the command that sets txpower and 30 is the highest you'll get Been doing a good amount testing on several routers both old and new. I’ve taken some of the newer ones and flashed them DDWRT so I can have more granular control over some of the settings. Interestingly enough, disabling CTS settings seems to make a difference. Research continues…Oh really? That is pretty interesting, I wonder why CTS would prevent that, as it should just prevent the collisions. Once I put the device properly in monitor mode, then I ran airodump! root@kali: ~# airodump-ng wlan0mon highlighting them and coping from wireless-regdb-2013.02.13 folder directly works nothing special here Now however the problem is that when I plug in the Alfa device my network connection from my other wifi ceases to work (Intel(R) Wireless-N 7260) (the connection bridged from my host). It disconnects in the host aswell. If I connect to a wifi (with 7260) in the host with kali and alfa running the alfa stops working in Kali... I want to have them both running. I’m new to penetration testing and have recently been taking online course, however I installed Kali Linux on windows 10 recently which all went fine. The issue i have is when I try using the the alpha AWUS036NHA wireless adapter . I works fine on the host machine however it isn’t passing through to kali linux. A lot of the times the adapter just cuts off when I start Kali and when I boot up Kali and then connect the adapter it dosent switch on as it should. I’ve tried your steps above however with no success. Also I’ve noticed that the usb icon at the bottom right of the screen is showing no activity i.e red or green blinking dots and it states ‘No USB Devices Attached’. I’ve tried the method above several times on different ports also with no success. I’ve ran the following commands on the Kali terminal

Alfa Network AWUS036NHA – USB WiFi Adapter, 150 Mbps, 802.11b Alfa Network AWUS036NHA – USB WiFi Adapter, 150 Mbps, 802.11b

For this question there is no exact answer. Wireless range is an imperfect science. The range you get with any adapter will vary markedly depending on the strength and quality of the wireless access point being used, as well as obstacles and interference in the area. Keep in mind that interference can often be invisible.WifiTxBoost(you may edit file with wlan1 too, the monitor mode (wlan1mon will be as per TX power set) I have the TL-WN722N myself, and I’m not a huge fan. Especially considering that any beyond v1 don’t support monitor mode/injection. This change of mind return policy is in addition to, and does not affect your rights under the Australian Consumer Law including any rights you may have in respect of faulty items. To return faulty items see our Returning Faulty Items policy.

New Alfa AWUS036NHA, Configuring for Kali, and Scanning New Alfa AWUS036NHA, Configuring for Kali, and Scanning

Alfa AWUS036NHA device problem - error 43 - device descriptor request failed (code 43) if switches between systems and VM. Do you know if AWUS036NHA with 9dpi antenna will give a longer range of clients than TP-Link-TL-WN722N? Surprisingly, it was working last week and when i set it up that time, it was nothing extra i needed to do. It came up by itself. https://www.cisco.com/assets/sol/sb/WAP371_Emulators/WAP371_Emulator_v1-0-1-3/help/Apx_ReasonCodes2.htmlHaha I actually find VMWare to be a LOT more user friendly, but the price for VirtualBox is a lot nicer.